星期六, 28 2 月, 2026
Home PV Companies South Carolina PSC rejects Duke Energy resource plan after SEIA testimony

South Carolina PSC rejects Duke Energy resource plan after SEIA testimony

Source:SEIA

On June 29, the South Carolina Public Service Commission (PSC) rejected Duke Energy’s Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) for the Carolinas and directed the utility to modify its existing and future IRPs in response to input from the solar industry.

The IRP contained several measures important to the solar industry, including decisions that would have impacted future electricity retail rates, availability of solar + storage power purchase agreements, coal plant retirements and several other consequential decisions for renewable energy in South Carolina.

Kevin Lucas, senior director of utility regulation and policy for the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), served as an expert witness for the Carolinas Clean Energy Business Alliance (CCEBA) on this matter. The decision from the South Carolina PSC specifically noted the impact of Kevin Lucas’ testimony on their decision and included a number of his recommendations in their final order.

“The Duke Energy IRP contained a number bad assumptions and methodologies that would have supported too much Duke-owned natural gas generation instead of developing more competitive solar, storage, and demand-side resources,” said Mr. Lucas. “We commend the South Carolina PSC for their thoughtful actions to maintain energy freedom and put ratepayers first. Now that Duke is going back to the drawing board, it’s important that its modified IRPs take a more realistic approach and consider the true cost-competitiveness, economic benefits and reduced risk of solar and storage.”

The PSC order directs Duke Energy to reconsider critical parts of the IRP, including to:

Update its cost assumptions for solar PPAs and storage and solar + storage projects;
Update its natural gas price forecast to reflect real-word supply risks;
Update the capacity benefits that solar and storage can provide for both summer and winter peak demand based on actual system installation data;
Increase the amount of solar than can be connected to the grid each year; and
Properly model the cost impacts of the plan on ratepayers.
Duke is required by the PSC to file modified IRPs within 60 days of this Order.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

China’s new renewables pricing mechanism may not give generators the stability they need

Since implementing its renewable energy law in 2005, China has been rapidly rolling out wind and solar power – from 10 gigawatts (GW) per...

Switch Together Solar scheme returns to help Solihull residents save money and cut carbon

A popular scheme that helps people save money on their energy bills while reducing carbon emissions is returning to Solihull. Switch Together Solar brings residents,...

BOOM Power secures second NSIP consent for Fenwick solar plant

The UK energy secretary Ed Miliband has granted consent for a 237.5MW solar PV plant developed by BOOM Power. The UK-based developer will construct the...

Indian PV manufacturers downplay impact of 125% preliminary US countervailing duty

The US Department of Commerce (DoC) has proposed a 125.87% preliminary countervailing duty (CVD) on imported Indian solar cells. Several Indian PV manufacturers PV Tech...